KMID : 0939920220540041268
|
|
´ëÇѾÏÇÐȸÁö 2022 Volume.54 No. 4 p.1268 ~ p.1277
|
|
Pegfilgrastim Prophylaxis Is Effective in the Prevention of Febrile Neutropenia and Reduces Mortality in Patients Aged ¡Ã 75 Years with Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Treated with R-CHOP: A Prospective Cohort Study
|
|
Jeong Seong-Hyun
Kim Seok-Jin Yoon Dok-Hyun Park Yong Kang Hye-Jin Koh Young-Il Lee Gyeong-Won Lee Won-Sik Yang Deok-Hwan Do Young-Rok Kim Min-Kyoung Yoo Kwai-Han Choi Yoon-Seok Yun Hwan-Jung Yi Jun-Ho Jo Jae-Cheol Eom Hyeon-Seok Kwak Jae-Yong Shin Ho-Jin Park Byeong-Bae Hyun Shin-Young Yi Seong-Yoon Kwon Ji-Hyun Oh Sung-Yong Kim Hyo-Jung Sohn Byeong-Seok Won Jong-Ho Kim Se-Hyung Lee Ho-Sup Suh Cheol-Won Kim Won-Seog
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
Purpose: Febrile neutropenia (FN) can cause suboptimal treatment and treatment-related mortality (TRM) in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients treated with rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisolone (R-CHOP).
Materials and Methods: We conducted a prospective cohort study to evaluate the effectiveness of pegfilgrastim prophylaxis in DLBCL patients receiving R-CHOP, and we compared them with the PROCESS cohort (n=485).
Results: Since January 2015, 986 patients with DLBCL were enrolled. Pegfilgrastim was administered at least once in 930 patients (94.3%), covering 90.3% of all cycles. FN developed in 137 patients (13.9%) in this cohort (23.7% in the PROCESS cohort, p < 0.001), and 4.2% of all cycles (10.2% in the PROCESS cohort, p < 0.001). Dose delay was less common (¡Ã 3 days: 18.1% vs. 23.7%, p=0.015; ¡Ã 5 days: 12.0% vs. 18.3%, p=0.023) in this cohort than in the PROCESS cohort. The incidence of TRM (3.2% vs. 5.6%, p=0.047) and infection-related death (1.8% vs. 4.5%, p=0.004) was lower in this cohort than in the PROCESS cohort. The 4-year overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) rates of the two cohorts were not different (OS: 73.0% vs. 71.9%, p=0.545; PFS: 69.5% vs. 68.8%, p=0.616). However, in patients aged ¡Ã 75 years, the 4-year OS and PFS rates were higher in this cohort than in the PROCESS cohort (OS: 49.6% vs. 33.7%, p=0.032; PFS: 44.2% vs. 30.3% p=0.047).
Conclusion: Pegfilgrastim prophylaxis is effective in the prevention of FN and infection-related death in DLBCL patients receiving R-CHOP, and it also improves OS in patients aged ¡Ã 75 years.
|
|
KEYWORD
|
|
Pegfilgrastim, Prophylaxis, Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma
|
|
FullTexts / Linksout information
|
|
|
|
Listed journal information
|
|
|
|